[IBL] IBL: More thoughts on a 2020 campaign

[drm13]

Use pro-rated limits, expand ML rosters to 28 and Org rosters to 40/45 and
play 162.

Some new teams catch lightning in a bottle and make a real run at the IBL
championship?  Great.  Someone hits .430 or 30 hr over a 60g season?  Cool,
add an asterisk to the record books.  Some of the alternatives we were
considering with no season were wackier and less interesting.

IMO, of course...

Dave
SNH

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:12 AM Doug Palmer <aeronutty43 at gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> If we assume that the MLB plays a 60 game season (and right now, I’m not
> convinced that’s happening), I’m curious how (or even IF) extrapolating a
> 162 game season would work for the cards?  Wouldn’t there be some
> significant abnormalities?  Especially with players who get a relatively
> low number of AB’s?
>
>
>
> I know it’s a bit premature.  Had I known that COVID would wipe out the
> season, I certainly wouldn’t have restarted a rebuilding project, but
> hindsight is 2020.  I think that’s what’s neutering my enthusiasm moving
> forward.
>
>
>
> The one thing that I think I can say without a doubt….COVID sucks.
>
>
>
> Doug/BAL
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ibl.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20200624/b7997bf4/attachment.htm>