[IBL] comments on mid-season ballot

[Kevin Greenberg]

I'm very disappointed.  Woke up this morning expecting a long series of
personal attacks.   Preferably accusing people of bad faith.

C'mon people, start behaving horribly!!!!!

On Saturday, July 26, 2014, Sean Sweda <sweda at ibl.org> wrote:

>
> On Jul 26, 2014, at 4:25 AM, Noel Steere wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid I don't understand this distinction regarding a "moving
> target".  If we vote to accept the current BF rules, there's no guarantee
> they'll ever be changed, so why not allow a clear improvement to be voted
> on simultaneously as well?
>
>
> Because there are at least 2 dozen other people who could chime in with
> their own ideas about improving the ballot.  All it takes is a few people
> to propose contradictory modifications or for someone to propose a change
> after votes have already been cast and the whole process quickly turns into
> a giant mess.  The call for ballot proposals was sent almost a month ago
> and it clearly indicated there would be a proposal to switch to BF.
>  Additionally, the ballot was available in draft form for an entire week
> leading up to the voting period, during which multiple changes were made
> based on feedback.  We've passed the point in our process where
> modifications can be made.
>
> Sean
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ibl.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20140726/ba1121ea/attachment.html>