[IBL] emergency activation questions

[Brent Cunningham]

3.3.3 specifically says that "The injured player who is removed from the
active roster", thus eliminating the ambiguity that I feel 4.1.1 had.


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Sean Sweda <sweda at ibl.org> wrote:

> Good enough for me, unless there is any objection the word "replace" in
> the first sentence of 4.1.1 will be changed to "de-activate".
>
> Are there any similar concerns about 3.3.3?
>
> 3.3.3   Playoff Roster In-Series Injury Replacements
>
> A team may (but is not required to) replace a player on its playoff roster
> who is injured during the playoffs and will miss games of a subsequent
> series. The injured player who is removed from the active roster will be
> ineligible to be re-added to the active roster for the next series,
> regardless of subsequent injuries.
>
>
> On Aug 18, 2014, at 3:10 PM, Russell Peltz wrote:
>
> > I think it can be interpreted either way.
> >
> > It seems reasonable to me to call up someone who plays the same
> position, without necessarily sending down the injured player.  The rule
> seems to exist to allow you to maintain a legal roster after a mid-series
> injury, and calling up a third catcher when both other catchers are hurt
> seems to be within the spirit of the rules.
> >
> > If the intent was that only the injured player could be deactivated, I
> think the wording should be made more explicit.
> >
> > -Rusty
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Russell Peltz
> > peltz38 at yahoo.com, rpeltz at soe.sony.com
> >
> >
> > On Monday, August 18, 2014 11:29 AM, Sean Sweda <sweda at ibl.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Aug 18, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Brent Cunningham wrote:
> >
> > > The question I have regarding 4.1.1 then, is this, and this might
> require a commissioner's edit of 4.1.1.:
> > >
> > > Is a DTD player considered as injured for the series, or is he
> considered as fulfilling one of those two roster spots?  Sean, if I recall
> correctly, you said at one point in the past that a DTD player counts as
> "healthy" in that regard.  If that's the case, then bringing up Nieves and
> having Montero DTD fulfills the "2 at each position" requirement.
> >
> > Correct, a player who is DTD can be considered your "backup" at a
> position.
> > <http://wiki.ibl.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/dtd-instructions>
> >
> > >
> > > Nowhere in 4.1.1 that you posted does it say that an injured player
> has to be deactivated the way it is currently worded.
> >
> > The first sentence specifically says:  "A team may (but is not required
> to) replace an injured player...".  "Replace" in the context of the active
> roster should be considered to be synonymous with "de-activate".  Similar
> wording is used in 3.3.3.  The word can be changed via edit, does anyone
> else think this is necessary?
> >
> >
> > Sean
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ibl.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20140818/aa5b7942/attachment.html>