[IBL] IBL: More thoughts on a 2020 campaign
Patrick Gibbs
pjgibbs at gmail.com
Tue Jun 23 12:31:58 EDT 2020
It will not only lead to abnormalities in stats, but also in usage.
I have been trying to figure out if there is a way to include the past two
or three MLB seasons into the equation to help normalize things. However,
this wouldn’t help those rookies picked as part of a rebuild.
Also not convinced MLB gets past the coronavirus hump and plays any games.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:12 AM Doug Palmer <aeronutty43 at gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> If we assume that the MLB plays a 60 game season (and right now, I’m not
> convinced that’s happening), I’m curious how (or even IF) extrapolating a
> 162 game season would work for the cards? Wouldn’t there be some
> significant abnormalities? Especially with players who get a relatively
> low number of AB’s?
>
>
>
> I know it’s a bit premature. Had I known that COVID would wipe out the
> season, I certainly wouldn’t have restarted a rebuilding project, but
> hindsight is 2020. I think that’s what’s neutering my enthusiasm moving
> forward.
>
>
>
> The one thing that I think I can say without a doubt….COVID sucks.
>
>
>
> Doug/BAL
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ibl.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20200623/b6790ad9/attachment.htm>
More information about the Members
mailing list