[IBL] Craziness Scenarios

[Sean Sweda]

TLDR version:

all 3-way and 4-way tie scenarios all require a playoff for AC West division title followed by another playoff for the wild card that may or may not also involve TRI

Sean
< via mobile >

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Sean Sweda <sweda at ibl.org> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, in the case where TRI is tied with the division winners then there has to be a playoff for the division. Then the losers of that playoff have a playoff with TRI for the wild card.  Shouldn't have tried to figure this out so late last night...  ugh. 
> 
> so in the 4-way tie plus TRI at 88 wins there would be a 4-way playoff for the AC West division followed by a 4-way playoff (losers + TRI) for the WC
> 
> in the 3-way tie plus TRI at 89 wins there would be a 3-way playoff for the AC West division followed by a 3-way playoff (losers + TRI) for the WC
> 
> all those scenarios require 4 additional days of regular season playoff games, not counting the potential TRI/NJR makeup game which if necessary could make it 5
> 
> Sean
> < via mobile >
> 
>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Andrew Selder <aselder at me.com> wrote:
>> 
>> In any of the multi way play off situations in the AC West (other than a 2 way tie, and TRI out of WC race), don’t the ties have to be broken via play off since not all teams are guaranteed playoff spots?
>> 
>> “The IBL will use a one game playoff
>> when a playoff spot is at stake between the teams that are tied.
>> Tiebreakers will be used when all the teams that are tied are guaranteed
>> a playoff spot.”
>> 
>> 
>>> On 26 Oct 2016, at 23:44, Sean Sweda wrote:
>>> 
>>> AC Central tie would be broken by a tiebreaker since both teams are guaranteed a spot in the playoffs.
>>> WMS would hold the tiebreaker over PHI due to head-to-head record.
>>> 
>>> as for the AC West, the 4-way tie possible at 88 wins:
>>> 
>>> MCM 2-1 vs both POR/BAL (4-2 week)
>>> MAD 1-2 vs both POR/BAL (2-4 week)
>>> POR 1-2 vs MCM, 2-1 vs MAD (3-3 week)
>>> BAL 1-2 vs MCM, 2-1 vs MAD (3-3 week)
>>> 
>>> MCM would hold the tiebreaker due to best division record (30-24)
>>> 
>>> if TRI has 89+ wins:  MAD/POR/BAL/MCM playoff for division title (TRI WC)
>>> if TRI has 88  wins:  MCM wins division via tiebreaker, MAD/POR/BAL/TRI playoff for WC
>>> if TRI has 87- wins:  MCM wins division via tiebreaker, MAD/POR/BAL playoff for WC
>>> 
>>> and the 3-way ties:
>>> 
>>> BAL/POR/MAD with 89 wins (BAL 4-2, POR 4-2, MAD 3-3, MCM 1-5)
>>> MAD would hold the tiebreaker via head-to-head between the three teams (net +4 wins)
>>> 
>>> BAL/MAD/MCM with 89 wins (BAL 4-2, MAD 3-3, MCM 5-1, POR 0-6)
>>> MCM would hold the tiebreaker via head-to-head between the three teams (net +4 wins)
>>> 
>>> POR/MAD/MCM with 89 wins (POR 4-2, MAD 3-3, MCM 5-1, BAL 0-6)
>>> MCM would hold the tiebreaker via head-to-head between the three teams (net +2 wins)
>>> 
>>> if TRI has 90+ wins:  3 tied teams playoff for division title (TRI WC)
>>> if TRI has 89  wins:  tiebreaker holder wins division, remaining 2 teams + TRI playoff for WC
>>> if TRI has 88- wins:  tiebreaker holder wins division, remaining 2 teams playoff for WC
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:04 AM, Andrew Selder wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Going into the final week, a chance for mass craziness.
>>>> 
>>>> In the AC West, a 4 way tie is a distinct possibility:
>>>> BAL takes 2 of 3 v MAD at home
>>>> MCM takes 2 of 3 v BAL at home
>>>> MCM take 2 of 3 at POR
>>>> POR takes 2 of 3 at MAD
>>>> and presto... a 4 way tie at 88 wins
>>>> 
>>>> In the AC Central,
>>>> A WMS sweep @ PHI, and a PHI sweep @ PAD leads to a tie at 102 wins
>>>> WMS going 2-1 @ PHI, and PHI going 1-2 @ PAD leads to a tie at 101 wins
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If all those scenarios play out, the league owes Rusty a bottle of tequila :)
> 
>