[IBL] 2016 mid-season ballot

Alex Campbell arc213 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 22:37:58 EDT 2016


my .02 for anyone who cares.

Regarding: Special Pitcher Activations in case of extra
innings/doubleheaders.  I am voting NO; my reasons are as follows:

if you have a doubleheader in a given week; plan for it by increasing the
number of relievers.  And if you have a marathon extra inning game and your
bullpen gets used up, then that is part of the game.  I see a lot of teams
that try to get by with 5 (and even one or two that carry 4) relief
pitchers and if you are carrying a short pitching staff you should pay the
price if you go in to an extra inning game.  Emergency transactions are
allowed already in the case of injury; that is understandable.  Since we
get to make transactions every 3 games, I think this is over kill.

In the NC, we have a lot of MIS play. If I have an extra inning game I
don't want to have to wait for the opposing owner to respond to an email
deciding whether or not they want to make a transaction.

I am willing to revisit this in the off-season but I don't think it should
be instituted during the middle of a season.

as far as equitable handling of pitcher rest, i am voting yes on both
options.

AC

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Sean Sweda <sweda at ibl.org> wrote:

>
> On Jul 19, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Sean Sweda wrote:
>
> > This is very brief ballot to address a couple of issues.  If passed,
> these rules will take effect immediately.
> >
> > Schedule:
> >
> > Tue 7/19 thru Thu 7/22, Discussion Period
> > Fri 7/22 thru Thu 7/29, Debate Period
> > Fri 7/29 votes due
> >
> > The Discussion Period is for questions about wording, how the rule(s)
> work, etc., in order to allow for an opportuntity to edit for clarity and
> address unintended consequences.  If you wish to advocate for, or argue
> against a proposal please wait for the Debate Period.  If any of the
> proposals are edited as a result of the Discussion Period an updated ballot
> will be sent out.
>
>
> Since there have not been any questions about the rule proposals I'm going
> to close the Discussion Period.  The proposals will remain as written.  The
> Debate Period is now in effect, feel free to discuss the merits of the
> proposals on the mailing list.
>
> full text of ballot is available via list archive:
> http://lists.ibl.org/pipermail/members/2016-July/001807.html
>
> ** REMINDER **
> VOTING INSTRUCTIONS:
>
> Votes are due Friday, July 29.  Votes must be YES/NO/ABSTAIN.  In addition
> to voting on both 2016-02a/b, you should indicate a preference should both
> pass.
>
> Votes should be emailed to:  vote at ibl.org
>
> Please use the template below for voting:
>
> 2016-01)
> 2016-02a)
> 2016-02b)
> 2016-02 PREFER a or b)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ibl.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20160721/e4f0482f/attachment.html>


More information about the Members mailing list